Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Thanks Nikos. I was really asking a general question about what's the best answer generally for producing both formats, _a propos_ the situation of Eric's manual.LaTeX is the answer to this.
There's a general answer to this question, but I can only respond for myself. I personally can't stand PDF. That the DM4 is in PDF is just another reason inform sucks (in my largely uninformed opinion).1) My impression from looking at r.a.i-f is that the most commonly used IF language is currently Inform, yet, so far as I am aware, the DM4 and IBG exist only in DPF (or printed format) and not as HTML; certainly I found them perfectly usable in PDF, so I wonder how much demand for an HTML version of my guide there'd really be.
3) [...] I think the conversion to a 'perfect' HTMLI think HTML format is perfect for online viewing, if 'electronic' is a medium. I personally almost never print out online manuals; I don't see any use for PDF unless you're printing the material. I print out HTML anyway.
format would need to make some design changes to suit a different medium[...]
Or are we regarding this as a kind of test run for the mechanics of how MikeLike I said, I was asking a very general question, which you (or Mike) might or might not find profitable.
might produce the TADS 3 Manual, in which case the issues may be a bit
different?