Re: [Tads3] UnderSurface - Second Thoughts

["Mike Roberts" <mjr_@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Søren J. Løvborg" <kwi@it.dk> wrote:
> mjr:
> > My intuition is that the sense system is the wrong place to be > doing 
> something like that [hiding things "subjectively"].
>
> Hm. That is a very good point.
>
> Where could such a scope-hack then be added?
> In Actor.scopeList() ? Would that work?
Actor.scopeList would take care of the scope part, but I think you'd also 
have to exclude the subjectively unseen objects in Actor.visibleInfoTable.  
Between those two, you'd eliminate the objects from being referenced in 
command input or listed in room/object contents lists.

--Mike

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive larger attachments with Hotmail Extra Storage.   
http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es