Re: [Tads3] Listing Contents of Surfaces

["steve breslin" <versim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike writes:

> Maybe so - does anyone else have an opinion about adding this?  The "hider" 
> classes in tads 2 certainly seemed to get a fair amount of use, and this 
> has at least passing similarity to those.
Yes. Probably the scoping mechanism & isKnownBy() should be used for 
implementing under-hiders. (They should be out of scope until they're 
known.) The Tads 2 way of implementing this is sort of hacky, and I think 
because of that creates problems for new coders from time to time.

_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963